- Manchester United – Leicester / 182$
- Preston North End – Arsenal / 250$
- BSC Young Boys – FC Basel 1893 / 319$
- Magesi FC – Kaizer Chiefs / 180$
- CA River Plate (ARG) – Atletico MG / 162$
- Mamelodi Sundowns – Cape Town City / 155$
- Feyenoord – Ajax / 150$
- Kortrijk – Lokeren-Temse / 203$
- KV Mechelen – RAAL La Louviere / 193$
- Gent – Union Rochefortoise / 207$
WM formation
What is the WM formation?
What is meant by the WM formation in football?
What characterizes the WM formation in football?
The WM system, known for the shapes described by the positions of the players, was created in the mid-1920s by Herbert Chapman of Arsenal to counter a change in the offside law in 1925. The change had reduced the number of opposition players that attackers needed between themselves and the goal-line from three to two. This led to the introduction of a centre-back to stop the opposing centre-forward, and tried to balance defensive and offensive playing. The formation became so successful that by the late-1930s most English clubs had adopted the WM.
Retrospectively, the WM has either been described as a 3–2–5 or as a 3–4–3, or more precisely a 3–2–2–3 reflecting the letters which symbolized it. The gap in the centre of the formation between the two wing halves and the two inside forwards allowed Arsenal to counter-attack effectively.
The WM was subsequently adapted by several English sides, but none could apply it in quite the same way Chapman had. This was mainly due to the comparative rarity of players like Alex James in the English game. He was one of the earliest playmakers in the history of the game, and the hub around which Chapman’s Arsenal revolved. In 2016, new manager Patrick Vieira, a former Arsenal player, brought the WM formation to New York City FC. In Italian football, the WM system was known as the “sistema”, and its use in Italy later led to the development of the catenaccio system.