A Large Bank is not Required for Financial Strategy 2 of 6

Aggressive financial strategies in sports betting are a quick way to make money or a way to enrich a bookie? Let’s continue to understand the problems of such strategies in the example “2 of 6”.

2 of 6 – more like the name of the lottery. But no, this is a financial strategy for betting on sports in the bookmaker office. This is quite an interesting strategy, which, like other better known, has the right to life. But only the ubiquitous description on the Internet leaves much to be desired. As a rule, use aggressive financial strategies to offer sites that work with bookmakers. Everyone knows that at a distance strategy of this kind will always provide you with a minus on the distance and full pockets of the bookmaker. Also, if you look closely at 2 of 6, in fact, everything is not as simple as it is written about – “you need to win only two bets out of six.”

How 2 of 6 strategy works?

As the name implies, a player who adheres to this strategy will only have to win 2 bets and he can start a new round. The maximum number of bets is six. This is if among the first five bets there will not be two winning bets. After the sixth bet, regardless of its outcome, the player starts the strategy anew. The size of the bets should be increased as follows: 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12. As you can see, the first and second increases occur in a double size, and the subsequent ones are more smooth.

That is, the conclusion suggests itself that at the initial stage this strategy is a conventional Martingale, and on the second it is more similar to D’Alembert. A real symbiosis of these two well-known financial strategies! This is a classic kind of bet increase, which is everywhere offered on the Internet. In fact, it is very inefficient. The first part – a two-fold increase, everything is clear. But since the fourth bet starts a mess. The fourth and sixth bets are increased 1.5 times compared to the previous one. The fifth is slightly smaller – indeed 8: 6 = 1.33. Most likely this is done in order to preserve integers. It’s much easier than messing around with fractions.

Yield of 2 of 6 strategy and its cons

Now about profitability. Calculation for convenience is always carried out for the coefficient 2. So, even for the coefficient 2, there are cases when at two winning bets the turn of this strategy will give a minus. Consider the worst of the positive scenarios, when the player will have to bet all 6 bets. At the same time, let’s say 6th and 1st. The total winnings will be equal to 26 for our total scheme. it’s a loss. Of course, if the 4th bet (which is much larger than the first) and the 6th will converge, then this will give a win of 36 with 33 put. it matters which of these bets converge.

If we consider the classical version that for a coefficient close to two, according to the probability theory, two wins will come already to the fourth bet, then of course the strategy 2 of 6 will give a plus without problems. But it will not always be so. And the smaller the coefficient the player uses, the more such unprofitable options will be. Calculations show that the coefficient 2.6 is required for the game, so that this strategy gives a plus for two wins in any order. For smaller coefficients, questions arise.

If six bets do not manage to get two wins, then the player goes into a noticeable minus, which is very difficult to win back. If the player wants to use odds less than 2.6, but have a 100% yield on one turn of the strategy, then you need to change the size of the increase in bets, starting with the fourth step. It is thus possible to adjust the system to any ratio. At the same time, risks will increase significantly, the strategy will lose its mobility. All of the above can be related to the minuses of the strategy. Now about the pros.

Pros, against the background of other financial strategies of such a plan

The plus is that unlike other strategies, system 2 of 6 makes it possible to more effectively use cases of two or more consecutive wins. Let’s say that when you catch up, two consecutive bet players will give 1 + 1 = 2. And in our strategy this will already be 1 + 2. In practice, this really gives a tangible effect. Also, strategy 2 of 6 comes to the rescue of those who like to play by D’Alembert, but wants to use non-equilibrium coefficients 1.8-1.9, and more than two. Large coefficients will not give the necessary 50% win for D’Alembert, and 30% for the system 2 of 6 will be completely overpowered.

As a summary

The conclusion is simple: the system 2 of 6, which is quite logical, shows itself better than other strategies with a winning series. When it comes to losing the series – the bookmaker becomes rich in geometric progression. We once again remind you that professional cappers use flat as a financial strategy. If you want to increase the possible coefficient, then it is better to try to collect your first express for a minimum amount. Aggressive financial strategies should be used only on an additional game account with the amount that you will not regret losing. Always think with your head.