Combine Business With Fun as a Football Fan

Football is the most popular sport. Many millions of fans, professional and novice players, analysts, etc. understand it, know the characteristics of individual teams and athletes, watch what is happening in the world of sports. Is it possible to make money on football betting, knowing only sports nuances?

Unhurried growth

The betting player has a substantial bank, $1 000 000. This is an adult, fairly wealthy person. Football is his hobby since childhood. So experience in viewing and understanding this sport abound. At some point, it was decided to try to convert existing knowledge into additional income. Stable financial position, at the expense of their own business, allowed the player to act slowly and thoughtfully. This is a great advantage over those who have a very modest starting bank and unreasonable ambitions for its rapid increase.

Our hero also set himself to do the bar for 3 months an increase of 200 thousand dollars. Clean on football betting. Planned growth of only 20% of the bank. Due to the large size of the starting deposit and an impressive period, the better had the opportunity to bet on the most cautious and safe strategies and achieve solid net profit in absolute terms.

For comparison, a player who has 20 000 dollars. For a start, to achieve the same financial goal would be forced to raise the pot 10 times. First, this would require more risky financial and gaming strategies. Secondly, not everyone has enough patience to play at a distance even in 2-3 months. So many would have accelerated, even increasing the riskiness of actions, and, most likely, lost outright.

So, our hero set the size of the rate in the range of 1-3% of the bank: $10 000 — $30 000 per iteration. He had his own scale of confidence. All selected outcomes he ranked. Where the rate seemed promising, but with a certain visible risk, flirted by the minimum — 1%. If the outcome looked very confident — put 3%. And the average intermediate option — 2%.

A uniform flat financial strategy was chosen for the game. Without recalculating interest. Total, with an average step size of 2%, for the entire turnover of the deposit, 50 rates were needed. The outcome ratio was between: 1.50 — 2.40. The average was about 1.82. The game strategy required flirting the following types of betting on football: zero odds or individual totals greater than 1 for hidden favorites, less likely to play wagers on team net victories, Home Over (1.5), total is more than 2.5 and “both will score yes.” Quite a wide range of permissible outcomes. But the player deliberately chose such diversity, since he was well-versed in his sport.

So, the first round of 50 bets was as follows:

• 23 won;
• 11 came with a return;
• 16 lost.

(23 * 1.82 * 20 000) + (11 * 1.00 * 20 000) = 1 057 200

If we calculate the percentage of terrain, discarding returns, we get about 59%. Nothing extraordinary.

Total net after the first turnover was $57 200.

The second round was a little more successful:

25 won;

• 12 came with a return;
• 13 lost.

Patency turned out about 66%.

(25 * 1.82 * 20 000) + (12 * 1.00 * 20 000) = 1 150 000

Here the net profit was $150 000.

In total, for 100 bets it was $207 200. Planck’s profit was achieved earlier than planned, not in 3 months, but in 2 seconds. Under the terms of the player stopped as soon as he reached the required amount. Brought profit and set a goal for a new game segment. If for 3 months the profit had not reached the planned one, it would have stopped already at the designated time line and would have done the debriefing, figuring out why the profit bar was not reached.

As you can see, at the expense of a large bank and the ability to play with a small percentage, the better did not risk and achieved the planned profit, showing a very modest percentage of terrain. Without a doubt, such a player may have different lengths of the distance. Somewhere a 20% gain bar can be achieved in literally 2-3 game days, in a couple of weeks. In not too good periods, due to the uniform financial strategy it is very difficult to substantially squander the bank.

Second salary

Another example of making money on football stakes about a player who has a much more modest starting bank: $40 000. The goal of this better was to make a second salary for the month, which was also about 40K, on ​​the stakes itself.

Since it was necessary to make a profit of 100%, double the bank, and the terms were limited to one month, then obviously this player was forced to choose a slightly more risky financial and gaming strategy.

The financial strategy was chosen as a “percentage of the bank” with recalculation after full turnover. The rate itself was set at 10%, 10 rates per turnover. The range of odds was selected 1.70 — 2.50. On average — 1.85. The player has specialized in the following types of football betting:

• Total over 2.5;
• Individual total over 1.5;
• The second half is more than the first.

As you can see, the options without the possibility of return. It can also be noted that the selected rates were well amenable to insurance in live, which the better actively used.

• First round: 7 wins, 3 losses.

7 * 1.85 * 4 000 = 51 800

For the second round, the size of the bet was recalculated and amounted, naturally: $5 180.

• Second round: 6 wins, 4 losses.

6 * 1.85 * 5 180 = 57 498

• Third round: 5 wins, 5 losses.

5 * 1.85 * 5 749 = 53 178

A small setback, but in absolute terms, the player was in the black, relative to the starting amount.

• Fourth round: 8 wins, 2 losses.

8 * 1.85 * 5 317 = 78 691

Each circle approximately coincided with the weekend, 4 laps —4 saturated game weekends in European club football.

So, by the end of the month, the player made $38 691 net. Quite a bit did not reach the set level, but could be generally satisfied.

As you can see, a fairly high percentage of one bet creates great risks of running into a losing streak and substantially subside. But showing in the region of 5-6 pluses from 10, it is quite possible to keep, and to increase the bank at peak intervals.

Successful Martingale

The following example of making money on football stakes refers to such an odious financial strategy as Martingale. Here the player has focused on his extensive experience and confidence in order to prevent long losing series.

Starting bank: $100 000. Distance: 500 bets. Goal: 100% of net profit 100 000 dollars. Above. The size of the initial rate: 1%, 1 000 dollars. The average ratio of 1.90.

Bets were chosen the most different: a clear victory, a combination of the main outcome and total, individual total, total, both will score and a number of others.

Martingale scheme with a series of losses:

• 1,000 * 1.90 = 1 900

The profit rate is $900, which is laid on any of the following steps. Martingale.

• 2 111 * 1.90 = 4 011
• 4 456 * 1.90 = 8 467
• 9 408 * 1.90 = 17 875
• 19 861 * 1.90 = 37 736
• 41 929 * 1.90 = 79 665

Seventh full step will not work. But the 6 steps Martingale and — this is quite a lot. In our particular example, the player made a maxim of 3 minuses in a row and avoided problems with a large margin.

It is not difficult to calculate that giving only 25% of the terrain and not allowing more than three minuses in a row, the player would make a profit of $22 500. Five such circles on the minimum cross would give $112 500 of net profit, which is a doubling of the bank and the implementation of the plan. Of course, a higher permeability would give even greater growth and the goal would have been achieved earlier. What happened. The player has doubled before reaching 200 bets, pulled out a profit and started anew.

Moreover, such a scheme, in theory, allows access to the plus and lesser permeability if any series Martingale and drag to 4, 5, 6 steps. But it is also clear that the main caveat to the success of such a strategy is to prevent the 6th minus in a row. Such a low would lead to a significant draw-down of the bank and disrupt the plan. Then it would be necessary to replenish the bank, or to make the 7th step with the rest of the amount, having a chance to only partially recoup. The problem with this strategy is that it is recommended to everyone, including beginners. This particular better succeeds in its use, because it knows its business, has extensive forecasting experience and is quickly selected from the emerging negative segments.

“Ladder” 3 to 8

The next hero succeeded in promoting a very small starting bank to a substantial amount of net profit. He used the “ladder” strategy in a somewhat non-standard version with three stages. The starting bank was total: 4,800 dollars. One attempt: 400 dollars. Total, 12 attempts to bring the “ladder” to a successful finish. The goal: 200 000 USD. Net profit.

Total planned 3 stages. Each of the stages has a total factor of 8. It is possible to assemble this “eight” in various ways. In the form of express or sequential ladders. One way or another, the odds of the component parts are multiplied.

Examples of collecting odds of 8:

• 3 bets with a ” ohm ratio ” 2.00;
• 4 to 1.68;
• 5 to 1.52;
• 6 to 1.42;
• 7 to 1.35;
• 8 to 1.30;
• 9 to 1.26;
• 10 to 1.23.

In one of our reviews, we compared single bets with expresses for different amounts of components. There we argued that ordinaries are more profitable, and of the expresses, those with fewer elements are better. So it is not worth shrinking. Our hero didn’t really trust big odds, but he didn’t hit the little things either. Mostly used range: 1.35 — 1.68.

The most logical and simple choices for football were used as betting types: double outcomes, zero odds, Home Over (0.5) and Home Over (1), and sometimes Over (2).

Three stages:

1. 400 * 8 = 3 200
2. 3 200 * 8 = 25 600
3. 25 600 * 8 = 204 800

It turns out that as a result, the player played an express at huge odds of 512. But the process was extended over time. Many bets were insured in live. So it cannot be said that the process of achieving this result was identical to the felting of 15 outcomes of 1.52 into a single “sheet”. The game was much more meaningful. The win was reached on the 4th attempt out of 12 available.

The risks of the strategy are clear. You can repeatedly lose at $4 800 before you reach the goal. But we must understand that 200K clean is a resource for potentially 41 more visits to such a marathon. So self-confident sports forecasters, in parallel with the safer game of the main bank, can try their hand at this scheme or its variations.

Play tees

Another example of earnings was a success for a person who combined a Fibonacci Series financial strategy with small triple expresses. As it is known, in order to practice a progressive strategy for a number of numbers: 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21 — the odds of rates is required close to 2.62. Adequate ordinaries with such indicators are rare. So the better chose the collection of triple expresses for this case.

• 38 * 1.38 * 1.38 = 2.62
• 35 * 1.39 * 1.40 = 2.62

Something like that. For taking such odds, quite simple rates were taken, somewhere in common with the previous example: double outcomes, Over (1.5), Under (3.5), Home Over (0.5).

Accordingly, a series of enhancements looked like this:

1. 1,000 * 2.62 = 2,620
2. 2,000 * 2.62 = 5,240
3. 3,000 * 2.62 = 7,860
4. 5,000 * 2.62 = 13,100
5. 8,000 * 2.62 = 20,960
6. 13,000 * 2.62 = 34,060
7. 21,000 * 2.62 = 55 020

Of the initial bank of $100,000. 7 steps using this algorithm involved only half of the deposit. So this option is progressive strategy looks even more reliable than our earlier example of the earnings of the classic Martingale have. However, its specificity imposes the need to play high odds of 2.62. Our hero has found an approach to him turn tees. Avoiding too long series of minuses, according to this scheme, the player doubled with enviable regularity.

Conclusions

We have described for you 5 quite different scenarios, examples of earnings at football betting. They used completely different financial and game strategies. In addition to the example of the “ladders”, where the outstanding series of prizes in a row were demonstrated, the players did not show any supernatural parameters of patency. So try on these betting schemes and go for your success.